In all types of financing, it
is important for Customers to know the total amount that they are
required or expected to pay before they can fully own the property
normally charged to the Bank. Under BBA financing, a Customer is able to
know immediately the total amount payable since the sale price is fixed
(with exception to hybrid fixed and variable pricing BBA facility)
throughout the financing period. But for a conventional loan, the
Customer will only know the total amount payable on maturity of the
facility since the interest charge is on floating basis (pegged against
base lending rate or BLR which moves up and down), although he can also
know the potential amount payable on inception of the loan,
by multiplying the monthly installment due with the total repayment
period in no. of months.
For
academic purposes, the Writer will provide comparative analysis table
to determine whether DMF is cheaper than BBA financing. Comparison with
conventional loan will only be done in later session on debt financing.
Simulation 1 – DMF (MAM)
Simulation 1 – DMF (MAM)
• Monthly rental based on effective return of 7.0% to the Bank throughout the financing period;
•
Distribution of principal payment and profits to the Bank is totally
dependent on profit sharing ratio (PSR) except, during inception of the
facility where the monthly rental is calculated based on effective
return wanted by the Bank (if the Bank needs to maintain certain
internal rate of return for its profit);
• Any changes in monthly rental thereafter, the distribution of principal payment and profit shall be based on prevailing PSR.
Simulation 2 – DMF (MAM)
•
Monthly rental amount and effective return to Bank is similar to
Simulation 1 except Customer pays optional amount (without prior notice)
to equate the actual monthly rental payable based on 7.0% profit rate
used for calculating BBA monthly installment for similar financing
period.
Simulation 3 – BBA
•
Monthly installment based on actual calculation at profit rate of 7.0%
which is RM697.77 instead of RM575.00 for Simulation 1. The reason for
higher amount payable for BBA although the profit rate is the same;
is because Islamic Banks are using same formula
for calculating conventional loan monthly installment. We will learn
more about this formula in our session later on BBA.
Simulation 4 – BBA
•
Monthly installment is determined based on similar calculation
under Simulation 1 and same amount is payable throughout the financing
period;
• Non compounding on profit due but not yet paid.
Results of the above four (4) simulations are as follows:-
Explanation
Based on Simulation 1, the facility will be matured within 33.08 years and profit payable to the Bank is 156.58% above the original financing amount. However, for Simulation 2, with additional payment of RM122.77 monthly, to equate actual monthly installment of RM697.77 for debt financing, the facility will be matured by 19.83 years. In addition, total profit payable to the Bank is only 83.01% above the original financing amount compared to Simulation 3 which is 86.01%
(maturing at almost similar time to Simulation 2). But when we use RM
575 instead of RM697.77 as the monthly installment under Simulation
4, the facility will be settled by 35.08 years and profits payable is 168.10% above the original financing amount.
If
we are to compare the Equity Acquisition Period (EAP), the differences between Simulation 1 and
Simulation 4 is only about 1 year but under DMF-MAM model, the Customer
can pay optional payments without notice and this will help Customer
to buy the equity earlier.
Take
note that this simulation does not mean anything if Islamic Banks do
not adopt or offer MAM for their DMF but use ERM instead.
Those interested to have the excel version of the simulations, can email to the Writer at ismail.aminuddin2@gmail.com
IslamicBankingWay.Com
ALLAH KNOWS BEST.
No comments:
Post a Comment